The president of a public-interest law firm claimed Monday morning that the Biden administration encouraged “illegal” protests against Supreme Court justices.

“You’ve had the Biden White House encourage and condone illegal activity outside of’ the homes of justices,” Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said on “Fox and Friends First.” “It makes the justices unsafe, obviously. They’ve got children.”

“You have the left talking about riots if unborn human beings might have more right to life protections,” Fitton said. “In the attack on pregnancy centers, let’s be clear what the centers do, they help women who are pregnant.”

HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION!

The amazing, complex development of an unborn baby at the earliest stages of pregnancy often gets buried in the abortion debate.

But it is amazing, and scientists know so much more about unborn babies than they did in 1973 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Roe v. Wade.

A recent CBN News article highlighted some of these findings as the high court appears likely to overturn Roe this summer and allow states to protect unborn babies again.

“Some in the pro-choice crowd say a person’s life doesn’t actually begin until he or she is outside the womb, but the science shows an unborn baby at 15 weeks gestation is a living, breathing human being with unique DNA who can already feel pain,” author Andrea Morris wrote.

The great baby formula airlift of 2022 will soon be underway. After 40 percent of popular brands were out of stock by late April, Swiss manufacturer Nestle, which owns Gerber, announced it will fly extra baby formula to the United States. FDA rules effectively prevented the importation of foreign-made products, and were only suspended on Monday.

Cargo planes are fast, not cheap, and American parents will likely pay a premium. But the market is finally solving the shortage once the government freed it to do so. Dave Brat, Dean of Liberty University’s Business School, asserted, “the free market in itself can solve this in a week.”

The leaking of Justice Samuel Alito’s abortion decision caused leftist journalists and celebrities to erupt in hate-filled attacks on Supreme Court justices and GOP politicians over the last three weeks.

MSNBCer Elie Mystal raged that “Alito’s fundamental legal reasoning” was worthless since it was based on the rationale of the Founding Fathers or as he called them: “racist misogynist jerk faces.” His colleague, MSNBC host Tiffany Cross was offended that the “dimwitted” Alito actually stuck up for the lives of unborn black babies in his decision as she lumped him in with other Pro-Life “terrorists” whose achievements came “through violence.” 

On CNN, host Jake Tapper pressed GOP Governor Tate Reeves on how many “women and girls” might “die” from Mississippi’s laws?

On Monday, without comment, the Idaho Supreme Court allowed state lawmakers to intervene in a lawsuit “challenging the constitutionality of a law they passed earlier this year that would ban abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy,” the Associated Press’s Keith Ridler reported.

The law is set to go into effect on April 22.

The request to take part in defending the Fetal Heartbeat Preborn Child Protection Act [Senate Bill 1309] came from Republican House Speaker Scott Bedke, Republican Senate President Pro-Tem Chuck Winder, and the Legislature. Last week, also without comment, the Court said the Catholic Church could not file a friend of the court brief.

In a victory for pro-life free speech, a federal appeals court struck down the University of Central Florida’s speech code that university officials used to limit free speech on campus.

The group Speech First launched the lawsuit against the University of Central Florida (UCF) after challenging three of its policies that suppress and punish student speech on campus. According to the group, UCF engaged in a discriminatory harassment policy, a discriminatory computer use policy and had a Just Knights Response Team that suppressed conservative speech.

“Through the use of these policies, the UCF and its administrators created a series of rules and regulations that restrain, deter, suppress, and punish speech about the political and social issues of the day,” the group said.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s sentencing pattern in child pornography cases was one of the big issues raised in last week’s multiday confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Clarity on this issue is needed before the committee, and then the full Senate, make their decision regarding Jackson’s nomination to the Supreme Court.

Federal law distinguishes among three types of child pornography cases: production, possession, and distribution. During the hearing, Democrats repeatedly offered two different standards for evaluating Jackson’s sentences for these crimes as a judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

First, Democrats said we should compare Jackson’s sentences to those of U.S.

Conservative attorneys slammed Democratic lawmakers’ attempts to pressure Justice Clarence Thomas into recusing himself from certain cases over his wife’s political activism.

“The Left’s partisan crusade to force Justice Thomas off of cases is not based on real recusal standards but on politics,” Carrie Severino, president of Judicial Crisis Network, said in a statement to the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Democrats in Congress sent a letter to the Supreme Court urging Thomas to recuse himself from cases involving Jan. 6 and efforts to overturn the 2020 election after The Washington Post published texts from Thomas’ wife, Virginia “Ginni” Thomas. She reportedly accused Democrats of attempting a “heist” and said “Do not concede” in messages to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in the days after the 2020 election.